Showing posts with label idiot. Show all posts
Showing posts with label idiot. Show all posts

Wednesday, 26 August 2015

Didn’t Signal



If there’s one thing for which Winnipeg drivers are notorious, it’s failure to signal, and I fail to understand why it’s such a problem while I fail to extend understanding.  Signaling a turn, signaling a lane change – not only are these legal requirements, they’re just good common sense.  If the surrounding traffic - pedestrians, cyclists, and drivers alike - is aware of your intentions, we’re all going to get along that much more safely.

So why don’t some drivers signal? I’ve heard the excuses: 

“There’s no one around.”  Um, if I just saw you fail to signal (and very likely video recorded you doing so), there’s SOMEONE around.  I think in this instance drivers are referring to other vehicles, but vehicles are not the only users of the road.  Pedestrians and cyclists need to know which way drivers are going, too, not just other drivers.

“If I signal, the other cars speed up so I can’t change lanes.”  I have two responses to that, and the first is “Good.”  Failure to plan on your part is not necessarily an emergency on the part of everyone else.  If you signal and can’t change lanes, SLOW DOWN AND WAIT YOUR TURN.  It’s in the manual: “Move into another lane only when safe” (MPIC, Driver’s Handbook, (2015), p.38, retrieved from http://www.mpi.mb.ca/en/pdfs/completehandbook.pdf).  The other response is: “WHAAAT?”  So, instead of signaling your intention and perhaps waiting your turn you’d rather selfishly endanger everyone else on the road?  That's called “cutting someone off” and I GUARANTEE you don’t like it when it happens to you.

“They can tell which way I’m going by the direction the car is going.”  Seriously?!  I call this “expectant telepathy”, assuming everyone else on the road can read your mind from the way you drive your car.  Newsflash: if you think the rest of us can mystically ascertain your intentions without any signals from you, your mind is already too tiny to read in the first place.

“I don’t need to.”  Um, yes.  Yes, you do. It’s the law: Manitoba Highway Traffic Act, Section 125, Subsections 1 & 2 (retrieved from https://web2.gov.mb.ca/laws/statutes/ccsm/h060e.php).

I have great deal of frustration surrounding this issue, summed up quite nicely by the following graphic:

Cue today’s idiot.  A guy in a red convertible turned without signaling and swore at me when I called him on it. I tried to chase him down to ask him why . . . 


If had caught him, I would have asked the question I ask all scofflaws: “So, in 50 words or less, why don’t the rules of the road apply to you?”  Ultimately, it wouldn’t have mattered what answer he gave – he would have been wrong.

Tuesday, 8 October 2013

Gets It

Friday, September 13, 2013

Readers who suffer from triskaidekaphobia would tell me that I shouldn't even have been riding on this day, but I am neither cowardly nor superstitious.

At 6:28PM, I was about to cross King at James with the green light when a car zoomed through the intersection against the red light on King - This Idiot #1.  I yelled an imprecation, and then another at the car behind him, who did the EXACT SAME thing - This Idiot #2.

I shook my head and took a deep breath to help clear the adrenaline rush from my narrow escapes.  I was about to continue on my way, thankful to be alive and in one piece when I thought: "No."

I decided, instead, to change course and see if I could catch up to them, if for no other reason than to record their license plates.  Sure enough, I could and I did, but I'm not going to publish them, for reasons I will make clear later.  What I will provide, however, is a transcript of the conversation that followed.

They both turned into the parking lot of a Chinese restaurant on the corner of Logan and King, and I waited for them to disembark.  Five women in dresses emerged from both sides of each vehicle until the young, male drivers made their appearance.

I asked: "So what do red lights mean to you guys?"

This Idiot #2: "Yeah, I'm sorry - I didn't notice it."

Me: "You didn't notice a red.  Light?"

TI2: "I'm sorry."

Me: "Thank you."

This Idiot #1: "I'm sorry, sir."

Me: "Thank you for your apology."

TI1: (motioning with his arm) "Yeah, because the sun-"

Me: "Please be more careful in the future."

TI1: "Yeah, sorry, sir."

Me: "Have a nice evening."

TH1: "(unintelligible)  I saw you."

Me: "Fortunately, I saw you, too."

That was it; a 20-second conversation with no histrionics, no name-calling, no yelling, no violence - actual or implied - on my part or theirs.

They were wrong; I confronted them; they apologized, and there was no need to take it any further, so I'm not editing and uploading a video or publishing their license plates for all to see.

We can't help being idiots.  Everyone will slip into a state of idiocy at some point, but we can all choose whether we are going to be polite or rude about it.

These guys got it.

Friday, 27 September 2013

Has No Respect

Cyclists don't belong on sidewalks (although some bike riders will ride on them anyway).

Cyclists belong on the road if they can't find a suitable bike path (always my preference).

This rankles some drivers and scares the heebie-jeebies out of some cyclists, but that's the Highway Traffic Act.

I don't have a problem being on the road, but that's because I bother to follow the rules of the road.  I think other, true cyclists also tend to obey the traffic laws, whereas your average garden-variety bike rider will do so only when convenient, because REAL cyclists know that following the rules engenders respect.

Motorists HATE it when bike riders sidle up beside them at red lights.  It's unsafe, it's illegal - it's disrespectful.

Motorists HATE it when bike riders run red lights and stop signs.  It's unsafe, it's illegal - it's disrespectful.

Which brings us to today's idiot:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sd8RuAG12GA&feature=youtu.be

Motorists do not respect bike riders, and by extension, cyclists, in this city.  Why should they?  By and large, bike riders and cyclists don't respect the rules of the road.

All it will take to reduce the friction is for bike riders and cyclists alike who ride on the road is to show some respect for the rules.

This seems so simple to me that anyone who can't grasp it seems like an idiot.

Tuesday, 24 September 2013

This Idiot is a Motorist

My first blog entry with a video featured cyclists, and the second pedestrians.  Since then I have logged hundred of kilometres on my bicycle, most of those rides captured on video.  Upon review, it would seem that my main concern with Winnipeg drivers is their apparent and total disregard for using turn signals.

I`ll post a clip montage on that topic another time.

Today`s entry is reserved for one special driver I encountered last summer.  She . . . she just . . . well, see for yourself:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EwFmYaUoT_4

What are the options here?  Clearly, she found herself somewhere she didn't want to be, but instead of going with the flow of traffic and looping around, she deliberately flouted the rules of the road.  Did she think they didn't apply to her?  That it would be all right "just this once"?  That apologizing would make everything okay?

Fortunately, the rest of us on the road that morning were driving defensively, and no one was hurt.

This time.

Monday, 5 September 2011

Any Idiot Can Ride A Bike

The following video is a montage of idiots I saw riding bikes over the course of three days.  These seven idiots must have thought they were pedestrians – THEY WERE ON THE SIDEWALK.  I hesitate to call them “cyclists,” because I think true cyclists will only use a sidewalk if there’s no other option.  It also comes as no surprise to me that the majority of the idiots I filmed over these three days were bicycles riders.  After all, you need to be able to pass a test to get a driver’s license.



Idiots 1, 2, & 3 were all on the sidewalk within twenty seconds of each other at the corner of Sherbrook and William on Wednesday, August 31, 2011, around 5PM.  They were all heading south, but 2 is on the east sidewalk of Sherbrook, while Idiots 1 and 3 were both heading south on the west sidewalk of Sherbrook.

Idiot 4 was proceeding west on the south sidewalk of Higgins about ten minutes later on the same day.

There were two more cyclists on the sidewalk that day, and one of them was me, but the greater idiocy would have been to remain on the road: there simply is not enough room on the Louise Bridge for rush hour traffic and cyclists.  Another cyclist approached on the bridge, and very courteously dismounted to let me pass, so I can hardly fault him for committing the same error as me.

This issue of safe passage on this particular bridge has come to the attention of Winnipeg’s finest before, and their answer was . . . to ride on the sidewalk!  Check out this link:


I can hardly wait for the dedicated bike lanes on the Disraeli to be finished, so I can stay off the sidewalk and out of the way of motorists.

Idiot 5 turned north on at the northeast corner of Sherbrook and William, about 7:40AM on Friday, September 1, 2011.

Idiot 6 zoomed north on the east sidewalk of Isabel about 4:30PM at the corner of McDermot on Friday, September 2, 2011.

Idiot 7 was waiting to cross on the east sidewalk of Aulneau at Provencher on her bike around 4:40PM the same day as Idiot 6.  I guess women can be idiots, too.

Friday, 2 September 2011

Don't Be An Idiot

Scott Adams, creator of the Dilbert comic strip, asserts in his 1996 book, The Dilbert Principle, that: “Idiocy in the modern age isn’t an all-encompassing, twenty-four situation for most people.  It’s a condition that everybody slips into many times a day.  Life is just too complicated to be smart all the time.”

 This blog is dedicated to exposing those bouts of idiocy, perpetrated by pedestrians, cyclists, and motorists alike here in the fair city of Winnipeg.   Let’s be honest; they’re – WE’RE – all fairly rude to one another.  Pedestrians leap out in front of cyclists and motorists, blithely confident in that in any situation they have the right of way.  Cyclists are, by and large, unheedful (and by extension, unaware?) of traffic laws and / or how to obey them.  Motorists, endangering and endangered by both of the others, have the greatest presence on the road and often demonstrate the least responsibility.

No one group is any better than the others, and no one group is any worse (Well, actually, that’s not true – in my opinion cyclists are the worst of the lot, but we’ll get to that).  If you have never jaywalked or crossed against the green; if you have never ridden on the sidewalk or jumped the red light queue; if you have never cut someone off in traffic or talked on your cell phone while driving; then you need not read this blog.  You’re perfect.  This doesn’t apply to you.

I am all three: walker, biker, driver, and I obey the rules as best I can in any given traffic situation.  As a pedestrian, I cross at intersections (generally) and indicate my intent to enter a pedestrian corridor by extending my arm and waiting for the traffic to stop.  As a cyclist, I signal my turns and stops and *GASP!* wait my turn in the red light queue.    As a motorist . . . well, let’s just say I haven’t had any sort of ticket for a long time.

I’m not perfect by a long stretch.  Winnipeg is situated on two rivers and connected by a series of bridges and on some of those bridges there simply is not enough room for motorists AND cyclists – in those cases, I ride on the sidewalk.  IT’S SAFER.  Sometimes, I’ll blow through a stop sign . . . after slowing down to make sure there is no oncoming traffic (oddly, I will still signal a turn if no one’s around).  It doesn’t make sense for me to give up momentum if it’s safe to proceed, but if there IS an oncoming vehicle, I stop.  Period.  In a confrontation with a vehicle the cyclist always loses.  No exceptions.

The key is “safety” and it seems like the only person who’s looking out for mine is me and I can’t stand it anymore, especially since I am so conscientious about everyone else’s.   I have become deeply infuriated with commuters who believe they are so special that they live in a universe where the rules do not apply to them, that the rules are for everybody else.  I’ve had enough.  I’m taking a stand and here’s my battle cry:

“Your personal convenience does not outweigh my safety!”

 . . . or anyone else’s, for that matter.   

How hard is it, really, to extend some simple courtesy instead of insisting on your “right of way”?  Having the right of way does not necessarily mean you are required to exert it.  Will those extra eleven seconds it took you to pass the cyclist really make a difference?  What’s wrong with waiting for the traffic to stop BEFORE you enter the pedestrian corridor?    Isn’t it more reasonable to signal your intentions to the cars around you instead of hoping they’ll read your mind and not turn you into a two-wheeled street pizza?  This is kindergarten stuff: 

“Play fair.”   

“Wait your turn.”   

“Don’t hit people.”   

At the end of the 1991 movie Hook, Peter Pan advises his Lost Boys on how get along once he’s gone: “I want you to take care of everything that's smaller than you.”   Motorists, that would be cyclists.  Cyclists, that would be pedestrians.  Pedestrians . . . I guess you’ll have to watch out for children and animals.  Argue if you will that Neverland is a fantasy, but following Pan’s concrete advice could put us on the path to making Winnipeg’s streets safer for everyone.   

In her 2010 book, I See Rude People, writer and columnist Amy Alkon speculates that we’re rude because we can “get away with it,” that our brains are wired for much smaller social groups and thus we reserve common courtesy for people in our immediate social circles and feel free to offer rudeness to the stranger we will likely never see again.  The solution, she writes, is simply to stop allowing people to get away with it. 

Stand up.  Speak up.  Call it as you see it.  Tell it like it is.  Ask for courtesy, and give it in return.  

Hence, this blog.  I will be posting images and video captures of commuters – of any variety – who demonstrate exceptional aptitude for idiocy.  My fellow idiots, you can no longer anonymously disregard the lives and safety of others.  I will post your idiocies here for the world to see.  I will shame you into doing what’s right if you can’t figure it out for yourself.

Remember: no one is a complete idiot, but we are all prone to bouts of idiocy, even this writer.  Some days, I will be THIS IDIOT (hopefully, those days will be few and far between).  Actually, I hope that as this blog progresses there will be fewer and fewer entries as we learn from each other.  It would actually be a great day when it wouldn’t be necessary to post at all.

In the meantime, if you don’t want to see yourself on this blog, the solution is simple:

DON’T BE AN IDIOT.